Legal Opinion

Pfizer Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided May 29, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KUSKIN, J.T.C.

In these matters plaintiffs appeal assessments of corporation business tax (“CBT”) imposed by defendant, Director of the New Jersey Division of Taxation (“Director”). The assessments resulted from the Director’s application of a statutory provision commonly referred to as the “Throwout Rule” in apportioning income of each plaintiff to New Jersey for tax purposes. The Throwout Rule is contained in N.J.S.A 54:10A-6(B), a section of the New Jersey Corporation Business Tax Act, N.J.S.A. 54:10A-1 to -41 (“CBT Act”). Plaintiffs’ respective appeals challenge the facial…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whirlpool Properties, Inc. v. DIR., DIV. OF TAX.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. In re Contest of November 8, 2011 General Election of Office of New Jersey General AssemblySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  3. International Business Machines Corp. v. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 2011
  4. Whirlpool Properties, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API