Legal Opinion

Antrican v. Odom

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 9, 2002No. 01-1693PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Senior Judge HAMILTON and Judge JACKSON joined.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge.

Several North Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries commenced this class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against North Carolina State officials to obtain (1) a declaratory judgment that dental screening and treatment services provided to minors in North Carolina under the Medicaid program are inadequate and fail to comply with the requirements of the Medicaid Act and (2) an injunction requiring the State officials to comply with the Medicaid Act by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Equity in Athletics, Inc. v. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Frank's v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. Meredith v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Doe v. KiddCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  5. Rosie D. Ex Rel. John v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API