Legal Opinion

Roy Karem George v. William C. Seabold

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1990No. 89-5711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Chief Judge.

In this habeas corpus action, the warden appeals the District Court’s partial granting of the writ. The petitioner, Roy George, has raised a serious due process claim with respect to his sentence, but because the petitioner has failed to exhaust his state remedies with respect to this due process claim, we reverse the District Court’s judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss the petition so that the petitioner may file a motion to correct his sentence under Ky.R.Crim.P. 11.42, as suggested by the Kentucky Court of Appeals in its order of August 17, 1988. 1

I

As a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duckworth v. SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Devore v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Melvin Duwayne Stamps v. John Rees, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. DurhamKentucky Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API