Legal Opinion

Van Sant v. Francisco

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1898No. 8155PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Blair, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

Francisco- recovered a judgment against tbe plaintiffs in error in tbe county court of Douglas county. Tbe judgment was rendered June 14,1895. An appeal undertaking was filed in due time, but-tbe transcript was not filed in tbe district court until July 18, four days after tbe statutory time bad elapsed. On the application of Francisco tbe appeal was dismissed, and this proceeding ..s brought before us for review.

The evidence on which the district court acted tends to *651show that plaintiffs ordered the preparation oí a transcript in due season and that it was prepared in ample time to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gifford v. Republican Valley & Kansas RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. MarstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liljehorn v. FyfeNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lynde v. WurtzNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API