Seely v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KRUEGER, Judge.
The offense is forgery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of two years.
Appellant’s first complaint is that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment. He contends first: that the instrument charged to have been forged is denominated a check and also a warrant which renders the indictment repugnant. Second, that it charges appellant made a false instrument in writing and also charges that he merely indorsed an otherwise valid instrument. Third, that it fails to charge in what way the indorsement created a pecuniary…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court · 1965