Legal Opinion
United States v. Erickson
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 5, 1980No. CR-79-184-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Following their jury convictions in this case, the Defendants Thomas C. Erickson and Aneta J. Erickson filed herein their Motion For Leave To Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Each Defendant filed an Affidavit To Accompany Motion For Leave To Appeal In Forma Pauperis. The Motion was also supported by Exhibit A setting out the issues to be presented on appeal and by a declaration of Clyde R. Maxwell indicating that he had been paid $30,500.00 by Defendants for his representation of them herein as their attorney and that a printer engaged by him has not been paid the sum of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dreyer v. JaletDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
- Dreyer v. JaletCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Roberts v. I-T-E Circuit Breaker Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
- United States v. PellegriniDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Thomas C. Erickson and Aneta J. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Donald Gee v. Ronald G. Ruettgers, in His Individual Capacity Duane Shillinger, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997