Legal Opinion

Jocson v. Crabb

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2004No. 03-0163PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this health care claim, we decide whether defendants Texas Woman’s Hospital of Texas and Dr. Maria Jocson waived objections to the ad litem fees awarded by the trial court. The court of appeals held they did by (1) failing to obtain a ruling on objections they lodged to the ad litem’s attendance at several depositions, and (2) failing to introduce the ad litem’s files. 98 S.W.3d 273, 278-79. We hold that objections to ad litem fees are timely if raised at the post-trial fee hearing and that introduction of the ad litem’s entire file was unnecessary to preserve the fee objection raised…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simon v. York Crane & Rigging Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. AM. GEN. FIRE & CAS., CO. v. VandewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Land Rover U.K., Ltd. v. HinojosaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Ford Motor Company v. Stewart, Cox, and Hatcher, P.C. and Turner & Associates, P.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. B&G Crane Service LLC v. Hector Barron, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Miguel Barron, Jorge Barron, Miguel Barron, Maria Barron, Isabel Barron, Jacqueline M. Berrios, as Next Friend of A.M.B., and Melissa Perez as Next Friend of M.N.B., and Osiel Rocha, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2022
  5. IN RE $109,151.53District Court, W.D. Texas · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API