Ross v. Odom

McClendon, chief justice.

Mrs. Ross sued Mrs. Odom (operator of a beauty parlor) for damages resulting from burns inflicted upon Mrs. Ross and alleged to have been caused by the negligence of Mrs. Odom and her employees while Mrs. Ross was obtaining a permanent wave in Mrs. Odom’s establishment. The trial was to the court, without a jury, and the judgment was in favor of Mrs. Odom. Mrs. Ross has appealed.

The controlling question in the case is whether appellant is entitled to a reversal on the ground that the trial judge failed or refused to file conclusions of fact and law within the…