Legal Opinion
Sandusky Bay Bridge Co. v. Fall, Treas.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 1931No. 141PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The property of the plaintiff in the bridge and the approaches thereto located in Ottawa County has been assessed as real estate by the County Auditor of said County on a valuation of $500,000.00 and placed on the tax duplicate for that amount. The plaintiff contends that its property is not in fact real estate and avers that the body of water known as Sandusky Bay is a navigable body of water and that the lands underlying the waters thereof are owned by the State of Ohio in trust for the benefit of all of the people of the State. Plaintiff’s contention, in fact, is that its property is not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Smith v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Russell v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
- People ex rel. Harlem River & Port Chester Railroad v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- People ex rel. City of Chicago v. UphamIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rapa v. HainesMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1951
- Pandora Distribution, LLC v. Ottawa OH, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019