Legal Opinion

Stivers v. Pacific Building, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1980No. 80-45PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Ethel M. Stivers, a resident of Iowa, entered into a contract with Bartlett Homes, Inc., to construct a dwelling house for her on a lot she owned at Fairfield Bay in Van Burén County. Bartlett Homes purchased a modular pre-cut home from Pacific Building, Inc., who brought this action claiming a materialman’s lien on appellant’s lot for the purchase price. Mrs. Stivers seeks a reversal of the court’s decree against her upon two grounds, i.e., that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations and the lien statute is unconstitutional. We find no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pender v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Williams v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. South Central District of Pentecostal Church of God of America, Inc. v. Bruce-Rogers Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Roach v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Railway Co. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API