Hood Ex Rel. Merchants & Manufacturers Bank v. Freel
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBkogdeN, J.
Can a creditor of the heir intervene in a proceeding to sell the land of the intestate to make assets to pay the debts of such intestate?
The judgment rendered by Judge Clement, at the January Term, 1933, was not a final judgment because it ordered the administrator “to proceed promptly and with diligence to make the necessary sale or sales in order to obtain assets to pay said debt . . . and this cause is retained for further orders.” Consequently the right to intervene is not foreclosed. Wadford v. Davis, 192 N. C., 484, 135 S. E., 353. See, also, Page v. McDonald, 159 N. C., 38, 74 S. E.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Page v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Wadford v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Battle v. . DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dempster Bros., Inc. v. United States Fidelity & G. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964