Legal Opinion

Hood Ex Rel. Merchants & Manufacturers Bank v. Freel

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBkogdeN, J.

Can a creditor of the heir intervene in a proceeding to sell the land of the intestate to make assets to pay the debts of such intestate?

The judgment rendered by Judge Clement, at the January Term, 1933, was not a final judgment because it ordered the administrator “to proceed promptly and with diligence to make the necessary sale or sales in order to obtain assets to pay said debt . . . and this cause is retained for further orders.” Consequently the right to intervene is not foreclosed. Wadford v. Davis, 192 N. C., 484, 135 S. E., 353. See, also, Page v. McDonald, 159 N. C., 38, 74 S. E.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Page v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Wadford v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Battle v. . DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dempster Bros., Inc. v. United States Fidelity & G. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API