Legal Opinion

Halpern v. Grabosky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1928No. Appeal, 265PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Plaintiff’s bill was to compel defendant to return stock held as collateral security, to restrain its assignment, and account for all money, securities or other property received by him. The court below found plaintiff and defendant agreed to form a corporation, the 6. H. P. Cigar Co., with capital of $15,000, divided into-300 shares. Plaintiff was to subscribe for 90 shares, defendant 172% shares, and Polleck, the third member, 37% shares. Defendant was to advance the money plaintiff was to pay, and take his stock as collateral. All dividends were to be paid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. American Brick & Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Montgomery Web Co. v. Dienelt, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1890
  3. Ashhurst's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Koehler v. St. Mary's Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Maxler v. Freeport BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weisbecker v. Hosiery Patents, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Weinroth v. Homer Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Mortgage Building & Loan Ass'n CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Ringler v. Atlas Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Zweifach v. SCRANTON LACE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API