Legal Opinion

Cegielski v. St. Francis Home

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss at the close of proof. Contrary to defendant’s contention, expert testimony was not required to establish a prima facie case because this case involves ordinary negligence, not medical malpractice (see, Kerker v Hurwitz, 163 AD2d 859, remittitur amended 166 AD2d 931; see generally, White v Sheehan Mem. Hosp., 119 AD2d 989). The court also properly refused to charge the affirmative defense of culpable conduct; there was no evidence that plaintiff’s decedent was negligent (see,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willis v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of AmsterdamNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. White v. Sheehan Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Kerker v. HurwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Kerker v. HurwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lidge v. Niagara Falls Memorial Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API