Legal Opinion

Rotunno v. Stiles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the defendant Hanover Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered March 30, 2005, as granted the motion of the defendant Hamilton William Stiles, Jr., for a judgment declaring that it has a duty to defend and indemnify him in this action and to pay his reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees, and denied its cross motion for a judgment declaring that it has no duty to defend and indemnify the defendant Hamilton William Stiles, Jr., in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Frontier Insulation Contractors, Inc. v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. 210-220-230 Owners Corp. v. DeRaffeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Garcia v. Utica First InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API