Legal Opinion
People v. Palmer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends that his initial detention by police officers was unlawful and, consequently both the physical evidence and the showup identification testimony should have been suppressed. We disagree.
The relevant evidence indicates that police officer Jose Rodriguez received a radio transmission of an armed robbery in progress. On his way to the scene of the crime he saw three black males a few blocks from the scene. Upon receiving further descriptions of the suspects from his fellow officers, he remembered the three individuals he had seen previously and returned to look for them.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BrnjaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People v. AlleyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. TrompAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. BedoyaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. ColsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. ColsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.