Legal Opinion

Barnes v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 5, 1910No. Congressional, 11759PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The Reporter's statement of the case: The claim in the above-entitled case was transmitted to the court by the Committee on Claims of the House of Representatives on the 17 th day of February, 1905, in pursuance of the act of March 3, 1883, commonly called the Bowman Act.

Read the full summary

The Reporter's statement of the case: The claim in the above-entitled case was transmitted to the court by the Committee on Claims of the House of Representatives on the 17 th day of February, 1905, in pursuance of the act of March 3, 1883, commonly called the Bowman Act. The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. In the year 1903 and long prior thereto claimant was the owner of a tract or parcel of land situated on the east bank of the Monongahela River in the first ward of the city of Fairmont, Marion County, W. Va., containing about three-quarters acre extending…

1Opinion of the CourtHowry, J.

This case is one of a class originally referred to this court to find the facts and make report thereof to Congress under the provisions of the act of March 3, 1883, commonly known ■ as the Bowman Act, 22 Stat., 485. The jurisdiction of the court is invoked for judgment to be entered against the Government (for the sum of $15,000 in this particular case) under and by virtue of an amendment to the Bowman Act providing for judgment in certain cases, which amendment is set forth in the act of March 3, 1887, commonly known as the Tucker Act, 24 Stat., 505. Section 13 of the Tucker Act provides:

“…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Sinclair Pipe Line Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. R. S. Howard Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  4. Chrystal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  5. Hood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API