Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1977No. 386Published

1DissentRoberts, Justice

The majority states that even if appellate counsel establishes that post-trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to raise the ineffectiveness of trial counsel, the issue of trial counsel’s ineffectiveness is waived. I cannot agree. Where appellate counsel establishes that post-trial counsel was himself ineffective in failing to raise the ineffectiveness of trial counsel, the issue is not *287waived. Waiver cannot be imposed where a defendant has been denied effective assistance of counsel.

Nor can I agree that an evidentiary hearing is necessary in this case. During closing argument, the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API