Legal Opinion

Layne v. Baggenstoss

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 23, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the Chancellor that defendants are the owners of the mineral rights, including gas and oil, under the surface of plaintiffs’ land.

The pertinent facts are as follows:

Both plaintiffs and defendants claim title to their respective interests through the title of Anna Bonn.

Plaintiffs own three contiguous tracts of land: seven acres, nine acres, and fifty acres. There is no question about a reservation of mineral rights being contained in plaintiffs’ deeds of the seven and nine acre tracts. However, no mineral reservation is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northcut v. ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Richardson v. SchwoonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cooke v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  2. J.M. Huber Corp. v. Square Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  3. Burress v. WoodwardTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Twinton Properties Partnership v. Nidiffer (In Re Twinton Properties Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984
  5. Hughes v. Cowan Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API