Layne v. Baggenstoss
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEWIS, Judge.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the Chancellor that defendants are the owners of the mineral rights, including gas and oil, under the surface of plaintiffs’ land.
The pertinent facts are as follows:
Both plaintiffs and defendants claim title to their respective interests through the title of Anna Bonn.
Plaintiffs own three contiguous tracts of land: seven acres, nine acres, and fifty acres. There is no question about a reservation of mineral rights being contained in plaintiffs’ deeds of the seven and nine acre tracts. However, no mineral reservation is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Northcut v. ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Richardson v. SchwoonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cooke v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- J.M. Huber Corp. v. Square Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
- Burress v. WoodwardTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Twinton Properties Partnership v. Nidiffer (In Re Twinton Properties Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984
- Hughes v. Cowan Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.