Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beach v. Lima Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2011No. Docket 139394Published

1DissentMarkman, J.

I respectfully dissent. The exclusive way to “vacate, correct, or revise a recorded plat or any part of a recorded plat” is to file a lawsuit pursuant to the procedures of the Land Division Act (LDA), MCL 560.101 et seq. MCL 560.222; Martin v Beldean, 469 Mich 541, 542-543; 677 NW2d 312 (2004). This rule is compelled by the explicit language of the LDA, and was explicitly recognized in Martin. Even the majority appears to acknowledge this rule. Yet, disregarding the core purpose of the LDA — to “ ensure [] that plats on file remain accurate,” Martin, 469 Mich at 551 *122n 24 — the majority holds…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. G C Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Sidun v. Wayne County TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API