Legal Opinion · Dissent
In Re Svitojus' Estate
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1943No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 42,528Published
1DissentChandler, J.
I believe the judgment entered in this case should be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial for the reasons expressed by me in the following cases: Svitojus v. Kurant, 293 Mich. 291; In re Svitojus Estate (Svitojus v. Smolenski), 296 Mich. 19, and Smolenski v. Kent Probate Judge, 301 Mich. 8. Appellant should recover costs.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smolenski v. Kent Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Svitojus v. KurantMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Svitojus v. SmolenskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1941