Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Svitojus' Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1943No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 42,528Published

1DissentChandler, J.

I believe the judgment entered in this case should be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial for the reasons expressed by me in the following cases: Svitojus v. Kurant, 293 Mich. 291; In re Svitojus Estate (Svitojus v. Smolenski), 296 Mich. 19, and Smolenski v. Kent Probate Judge, 301 Mich. 8. Appellant should recover costs.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smolenski v. Kent Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Svitojus v. KurantMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Svitojus v. SmolenskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1941