Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Stitt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 25, 1987No. 86-413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal challenges the trial court's order denying the motion of the deceased minor's mother for substitution as plaintiff. The defendant (appellee) contends that the mother of the deceased minor failed to meet the statutory requirement for substitution as the proper party plaintiff in this cause and, consequently, that the trial court did not err in denying her motion for substitution. Citing Code 1975, § 6-5-391, and Mattingly v. Cummings,392 So.2d 531 (Ala. 1980), the appellee insists that the trial court properly dismissed the case for failure of the father to appear for a deposition…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mattingly v. CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Rainer v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Carter v. BeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Nix v. McElrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API