Legal Opinion

Opinion No. 68-252 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided August 15, 1968Published

1Opinion of the Court

Public Accountancy — Requirements-Employee-Principal Title 59 O.S. 15.21 [59-15.21] (1968), concerning public accountants is to be read as written; and the distinction between "employee" and "principal" made in subsection (3) of Section 16 is not to be read into subsection (1). The Attorney General acknowledges receipt of your letter wherein you ask, regarding House Bill No. 1216, 31st Legislature, Second Session, 1968, if "the intent of the law in the distinction between `employee' and `principal' in subsection (2) of Section 16 will also apply to those registering under the provisions of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Duncan v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Ex Parte HiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. State ex rel. Hampton v. OakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API