Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2016No. Docket 44011PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

Jonathan Hill appeals from his conviction for felony driving under the influence (DUI). His appeal presents a single question. Over Hill’s unsuccessful hearsay objection, the deputy sheriff who conducted field sobriety tests (FSTs) of Hill was permitted to testify as to what he had been taught regarding the presence of vertical nystagmus. Hill’s appeal challenges this evidentiary ruling by the district court. We vacate Hill’s conviction and remand for a new trial.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On the evening of January 10, 2014, the Nez Perce County Sheriffs Office…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. GleasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. Godwin, Sr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. GlodowskiIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. Roman-LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API