Legal Opinion

The Avon Company, f/k/a New Avon LLC, and LG H&H Company, Ltd. v. Fareva Morton Grove, Inc. and Fareva S.A.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 13, 2026No. 1:22-cv-04724Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE AVON COMPANY, f/k/a NEW AVON : OPINION AND ORDER LLC, and LG H&H COMPANY, LTD., : DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF Plaintiffs, : SUBJECT MATTER -against- JURISDICTION FAREVA MORTON GROVE, INC, and : FAREVAS.A., : 22 Civ, 4724 (AKH) Defendants. : penne ee □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ X ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Trial is about to begin of the central issue of this case, whether either or both the liquidated damages clauses in their contract are enforceable. As in every case, the court’s subject matter jurisdiction must be firm.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Universal Licensing Corp. v. Paola del Lungo S.p.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. State of California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Shearman & SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Prudential Oil Corporation v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API