Legal Opinion
Robert Allen, Cliff McNeilly Carolyn Mack v. Thomas D. Murph, Doris B. Murph
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 21, 1999No. 98-3948PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid A. Nelson, J., joined by Siler, J.,
KRUPANSKY, J. (pp. 724-30), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
DAVID Á. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
Thomas and Doris Murph appeal an order in which the district court denied a motion for leave to file an untimely application for attorney fees. The Murphs argue that their untimeliness should be excused because they personally did all that could reasonably have been expected of them in attempting to prosecute the application promptly. Unfortunately for the Murphs, however, their attorneys did not act with similar diligencé — and an attorney’s inexcusable neglect is normally attributed to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Juan Reyes, Juan A. Acevedo, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Nafziger v. McDermott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Turner v. City of TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- American Civil Liberties Union v. McCreary CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Stephen Tancredi and Ronald Speidel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Stock Company, and Metlife, Inc., a Delaware Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.