Legal Opinion

Onishea v. Hopper

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 7, 1999No. 96-6213PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COX, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiff class, all of whom are prison inmates who have tested positive for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), have sued officials of the Alabama Department of Corrections under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act1 to force integration of prison recreational, religious, and educational programs. The district court denied relief, and we affirm.

I. Background

This litigation began over a decade ago in reaction to a legislatively inspired program to prevent the spread of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) in Alabama’s prison system. Under statute,2 the Alabama…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Spencer Waddell v. Valley Forge Dental AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. John Doe v. County Of CentreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Kaplun v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Charles E. Donahue v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API