Legal Opinion

Medlin Milling Co. v. Boutwell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1911PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Fifth Supreme Judicial District. Action by E. M. Boutwell against the Med-lin Milling Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff (122 S. W. 442), defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This writ of error is prosecuted from the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming that of the district court in favor of defendant in error (plaintiff) against plaintiff in error (defendant) for damages for a personal injury inflicted on the plaintiff, a new employé of the defendant, by its other employés while attempting, in sport, to lay him across a barrel for the purpose of paddling him, a process which they called the “initiation” into the service. The defendant is a milling corporation, and at the time in question and for years before had a president, general manager, foremen,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis' Admr. v. Taylor Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Waldo v. Galveston H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Supreme Lodge Loyal Order of Moose v. KennySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co. v. GrubaughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  4. Palatine Ins. Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. American Ry. Express Co. v. TaitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API