Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ferguson Contracting Co. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided January 15, 1911No. 9640Published

Claim for damages arising out of a contract for the construction of a portion of the Barge canal.

1ConcurrenceRodenbeck, J.

The claimant made a contract with the State of New York, April 3, 1905, for the improvement of a section of the Erie canal adjoining the village of Waterford, consisting generally in the excavation and protection of the sides of the so-called Barge canal from, the Mohawk river to a point about a quarter of a mile west of the head of lock No. 3 and the construction of locks Nos. 2' and 3, with the approaches and appertaining parts, covering a distance of ninety-one one-hundredths miles. i

Thereafter from time to time, with the assent of the claimant, alterations were made by the State in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Jerome v. RossNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
  4. Woolsey v. . FunkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API