Legal Opinion

Brown v. Poff

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1965No. A-10693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The application for writ of error does not disclose a properly presented error which would justify the reversal of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals. Accordingly we deny the application with the notation, “Refused, no reversible error.” This action should not be taken as an approval of the Court of Civil Appeals holding (387 S.W.2d 101) that, when raised by the evidence, the issue of whether or not a plaintiff has sustained an injury is a “defendant’s issue” within the meaning of Rule 279, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. There is a marked distinction between the term “defendant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brown v. PoffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hulsey v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Brentwood Financial Corp. v. Lamprecht, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  3. Brentwood Financial Corp. v. LamprechtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API