McAllister v. Maltais
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
Since the accident occurred in Massachusetts, the rights of the parties are to be determined by the law of that Commonwealth. Roy v. Roy, 101 N. H. 88; Conant v. Collins, 90 N. H. 434; Lee v. Chamberlin, 84 N. H. 182. Consequently the verdicts for Cora and her husband, Lawrence McAllister, can be sustained only if the evidence warranted a finding of gross negligence on the part of the defendant as delineated in the opinions of the Massachusetts court. Massaletti v. Fitzroy, 228 Mass. 487; Altman v. Aronson, 231 Mass. 588; Lynch v. Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 294 Mass. 170. See…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Marshall v. NugentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
- Lyttle v. MontoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Lynch v. Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.