Wharram v. City of Utica
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter should be remitted with direction to enter judgment declaring section 17-26.1 of the Ordinances of the City of Utica invalid because in violation of section 80 of the General Municipal Law.
The city argues that its ordinance does not violate the section but has not contested its applicability to the facts of this case. The section voids “any restriction” by municipal ordinance or regulation of the carrying on of business by nonresidents, which restriction “shall not be necessary…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Loyal Tire & Auto Center, Inc. v. Town of WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Loyal Tire & Auto Center, Inc. v. Town Of WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Mathys v. Town of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Dun-Rite Towing, Inc. v. Village of TarrytownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Village Auto Body Works, Inc. v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.