Legal Opinion

People v. Dixson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 22, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered July 15, 2003, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review her specific challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence (see CEL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858 [1987]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. People v. GarafoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. BynumNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WhyteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re Matthew W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API