Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1898No. 10773PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Elk District Court. -A. M. Jackson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

An action was brought to. foreclose a mortgage executed by Jackson and Jemima Cunningham to secure a debt to J. Curtis Smith. L. Scott was employed as an attorney by the Cunninghams, in whose behalf he filed an answer and cross-bill, setting up that a certain other mortgage, which was of record, was not a lien upon the premises, and asking to have it canceled. Upon trial, judgment was given for Smith for the amount of his debt, and for a foreclosure of his mortgage; and judgment was also given upon the cross-petition of the Cunninghams, holding the other mortgage to be void, and canceling the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Kennedy v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Bedell v. ChristySupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Christy v. BedellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900
  5. Korte v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API