Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wymer v. Wymer

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1980No. BAP No. 80-0001-KGH, Bankruptcy No. 79-23464WH, Adv. No. 79-0008Published

1Dissent

HUGHES, Bankruptcy Judge,

dissenting:

I dissent.

My principal quarrel with the majority opinion concerns what I perceive to be its futility. In purporting to determine that Mrs. Wymer has no claim against Mr. Wymer it (1) ignores the reality of the state court judgment in her favor and (2) fails to reach the dischargeability question raised by this appeal. In failing to decide the dischargeability question, it has decided nothing.

As I see it, we can meet the needs of the parties only if we assume for purposes of reaching the dischargeability issue that Mrs. Wymer has a claim. Whether Mrs. Wymer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott Publishing Company, a Corporation v. Ralph Rodgers, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Mid-Columbia Publishers, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API