Legal Opinion

Michael Joel Pennington v. City of Huntsville

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 17, 2001No. 00-12757Published

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff Michael Pennington appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant City of Huntsville (“City”) on his employment dis crimination and retaliation claims. Pennington alleged discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. Because we find that the district court properly granted summary judgment, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

As part of a pretrial order, the parties submitted an agreed summary of the facts of the case. Below we set forth a condensed version of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Saint Francis College v. Al-KhazrajiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API