Mitchel v. M'Millan
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtMap tin, J.
delivered the opinion of the Court. . . , .. . ... The petition states the detendant to be mdebt-ed to the plaintiff for the balance of an account cun-eut, between the partieb, which is annexed.
The answer admits the debt stated, but avers that on the; days of the dates of the first and last items of the account and during the whole intermediate time, the defendant was a copartner in trade, with James Sloan, of Liverpool, in Great Britain, and established at Charleston, S. C. as a branch of the house 'of Sioane &. M’Millan, of Liverpool, as the plaintiff at the time well knew ; and that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Van Raugh v. Van ArsdalnNew York Supreme Court · 1805
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conrey v. ElbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847