Legal Opinion

Alexandre v. Garland

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 18, 2021No. 18-2532Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-2532 Alexandre v. Garland BIA Mulligan, IJ A209 866 675 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yan Chen v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Xiu Xia Lin v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Gao v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  4. Tatiana Pavlova v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Burger v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API