Legal Opinion

Franza v. Carey

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eve Preminger, J.

Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction to prevent the enforcement of article 39 of the General Business Law, the so-called “Head Shop Act”, claiming that it violates the Federal and State Constitutions. Defendants oppose the motion for preliminary relief and move to dismiss the action asserting that it is barred by res judicata and that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

Article 39 of the General Business Law, adapted from the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Model State Drug Paraphernalia Act (the Model Act), prohibits the possession and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gless v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Franza v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API