Legal Opinion

Coney Island & Brooklyn Railroad v. Brooklyn Cable Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Kings county.

1Opinion of the CourtPratt, J.

Nothing need be added to the able opinion of the learned judge who tried this case. All the facts are therein fully stated, and we concur in the law therein expressed. This general term in February last passed upon a case1 in many respects similar to this, in which it was held that under such a contract the party hiring a right to run upon the tracks of another railroad could keep the right, or part with it by assignment, but it could not retain the right itself, and multiply the beneficiaries. The contract here is a mere license or privilege for hire. It is not a lease conveying an interest…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brooklyn Crosstown R. Co. v. Brooklyn City R. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Costigan v. New York & Stamford Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Coney Island & G. Railway Co. v. Coney Island & B. R. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API