Legal Opinion
30 Clinton Place Owners, Inc. v. Singh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 5, 2015No. 2014-10331PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), dated August 6, 2014, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 (e) for leave to renew their prior motion, inter alia, to vacate their default in answering the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
“A motion for leave to renew must (1) be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination, and (2) set forth a reasonable justification for the failure to present such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Renna v. GulloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Zito v. JastremskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Swedish v. BeizerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Red Zone LLC v. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trigoso v. CorreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. ShahidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020