Legal Opinion

Williams v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1934No. 7,185PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

Plaintiff instituted this proceeding in an attempt to secure compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. He was employed by the defendant on June 14, 1929, the date on which he asserts an injury was sustained entitling him to compensation. He continued working for the defendant for a few days after that date. Thereafter he was a patient in the tuberculosis sanitarium at Galen from October 15, 1929, to May 11, 1931.

On March 5, 1930, plaintiff wrote a letter to the Industrial Accident Board, seeking compensation, wherein he gave the history of his case. The board on March 10 of the same…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dosen v. East Butte Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Lindblom v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Chmielewska v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Pincus v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Maki v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Birdwell v. Three Forks Portland Cement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Delmoe v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McCulloch v. HortonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Shugg v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. AndreMontana Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API