In re the Claim of Robert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHerlihy, J.
This is probably one of the first instances in which a claimant has been found guilty of misconduct because of "bad breath”. The claimant appeared pro se.
The claimant has been found guilty of misconduct because of "bad breath” under circumstances similar to those present in Matter of Llano (Levine) (51 AD2d 620) but upon factual findings which upon their face would appear to establish a different basis for the disqualification from benefits than the Llano case. The claimant appeared pro se in all proceedings herein. He had been employed as a handyman in an apartment building for about seven…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of LlanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Claim of PovedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- In re the Claim of FahyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federoff v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Federoff v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Kimberly A. Sparkman v. Burns Phillips, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Labor And Workforce Development, and First Tennessee Bank, N. A.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014