Humphries v. Blight's Assignees
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
4 U.S. 370 (____)
4 Dall. 370
Humphries
v.
Blight's Assignees.
Supreme Court of United States.
Hare and Dallas argued for the plaintiff.
Rawle argued for the defendants.
By the COURT:
1st. We have no doubt upon the right of the assignee of the note in this case, to prove the debt under the commission, and to receive a dividend. The certificate of the bankrupt, would be a bar to a recovery, in an action by the present holder of the note against him; and wherever a certificate will be a bar, the right to prove the debt, under the commission, must be unquestionable.
2d. In the case of negotiable paper, or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Snell v. Delaware InsuranceUnited States Circuit Court · 1806
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. Van ZandtSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- M'cullough, Asignee v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1789
- Inge v. Branch Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
- Lighty v. BrennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1826
- Fisher v. LelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1849