Legal Opinion

Humphries v. Blight's Assignees

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1803PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4 U.S. 370 (____)

4 Dall. 370

Humphries

v.

Blight's Assignees.

Supreme Court of United States.

Hare and Dallas argued for the plaintiff.

Rawle argued for the defendants.

By the COURT:

1st. We have no doubt upon the right of the assignee of the note in this case, to prove the debt under the commission, and to receive a dividend. The certificate of the bankrupt, would be a bar to a recovery, in an action by the present holder of the note against him; and wherever a certificate will be a bar, the right to prove the debt, under the commission, must be unquestionable.

2d. In the case of negotiable paper, or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Snell v. Delaware InsuranceUnited States Circuit Court · 1806

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Van ZandtSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  2. M'cullough, Asignee v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1789
  3. Inge v. Branch Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
  4. Lighty v. BrennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1826
  5. Fisher v. LelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API