Legal Opinion

Lorillard v. Kent

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 15, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit brought by the executors of the late Peter Lorillard to determine who is entitled to the principal of a certain fund which was created in accordance with paragraph 11 of the testator's will. The proceeding was regularly brought before the court, and all parties who claim any interest in the fund are named as defendants. I need not recite at length the paragraph in question, as all the defendants are represented by solicitors, and, being thus familiar with it, have sent me their views regarding it. I am satisfied from an examination of the will, which was evidently carefully…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Toms River v. LevyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  2. Simpkins v. SimpkinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Kahn v. RockhillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  4. Cody v. FitzgeraldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API