Legal Opinion

People v. Ewing

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 2016No. C072783PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, Acting P. J.

Defendant David Earl Ewing, Jr., and three others were involved in a “drug-rip” — where the seller takes the buyer’s money without ever handing over the drugs — gone bad. The victim was shot but survived, and defendant and his cohorts were caught trying to escape.

Defendant was convicted of multiple offenses and various enhancements, including — as alleged in count four of the information — that he shot at an occupied vehicle for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal street gang under Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (b)(4). (Pen.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. ZamudioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Pettie, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Felix MacDonald v. Anthony HedgpethCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. People v. Henson CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Patino CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API