Legal Opinion
PADDYAKER v. Griffith
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 29, 2011No. 108,276. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAY MITCHELL, Presiding Judge.
11 Deyo Paddyaker and Donna Paddyaker, Plaintiffs/Appellants ("Paddyakers"), appeal an order dismissing their case pursuant to 12 0.8.2001 § 2012(B)(1) for lack of sub-jeet matter jurisdiction and on the applicable statute of limitations.
T2 The Paddyakers allege Defendant/Ap-pellee Griffith in 1987 wrongfully conveyed to the Newcastle Public Works Authority (Authority) water and easement rights belonging to the Paddyakers. 1 Paddyakers seek to quiet title to the 75 acres they own from which the water rights were conveyed. They also seek damages for conversion of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Conoco, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Alfrey v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BASE v. DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- Hemp Hydrate Brands Corporation v. Private Label Supplements IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- SUBURBAN REALTY CO. v. CANTLEYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
- Taylor Crane & Rigging, Inc. v. Argus Logistics, LLC and Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2026