Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 7, 2007No. 1061553PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The State of Alabama petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the Marion Circuit Court to enter an order granting the State's motion to dismiss Thomas S. Atkinson's claims against it, with prejudice, on the basis of State immunity. For the reasons presented below, we issue the writ.

Background

On October 2, 2000, Atkinson filed an action styled "Thomas S. Atkinson, Plaintiff vs. State of Alabama, Defendant" in the Marion Circuit Court. He sought damages and attorney fees for inverse condemnation. Atkinson alleges that the State decreased the value of his real estate in the course of widening…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Ex Parte ButtsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Aland v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Alabama Department of Corrections v. Montgomery County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Poiroux v. RichSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  3. Health Care Authority for Baptist Health v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Jenkins v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Colbert County Board of Education v. James, 1100181 (Ala. 10-21-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API