Ford Motor Co. v. Moore
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentRiley, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority's decision to reverse the jury's verdict on the Estate's product negligence claim against Ford and TRW. The majority opines that the Estate failed to present sufficient evidence that Ford or TRW breached their duty of reasonable care. We note that upon review of a jury verdict, we will neither reweigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses, but will examine the evidence most favorable to the appellee and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom. Beall v. Mooring Tax Asset Group, 813 N.E.2d 778, 781 (Ind.Ct.App.2004).
As recognized by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Billy D. Bammerlin v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Ford Motor Co. v. RushfordIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- John W. WHITTED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, and New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Miller v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,980 Patricia A. Pries v. Honda Motor Company, Limited, and American Honda Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.