Hernandez v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*981OPINION
By the Court,
Maupin, J.:
In this appeal, we consider whether we should extend the holding in our decision in McConnell v. State1 to bar the dual use of torture as a theory of first-degree murder and as an aggravating circumstance to support a death sentence. We conclude that McConnell does not preclude the State from securing a murder conviction based upon a theory of torture and alleging torture as an aggravating circumstance in seeking a death sentence. Nevada’s definition of torture murder sufficiently narrows the class of persons eligible for the death penalty to allow the dual use…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Armenta-Carpio v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Cardenas-Ornelas v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Farrey (Benjamin) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2014
- Hernandez (Fernando) Vs. State (Death Penalty-Pc)Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.