Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2008No. 44812PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*981OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether we should extend the holding in our decision in McConnell v. State1 to bar the dual use of torture as a theory of first-degree murder and as an aggravating circumstance to support a death sentence. We conclude that McConnell does not preclude the State from securing a murder conviction based upon a theory of torture and alleging torture as an aggravating circumstance in seeking a death sentence. Nevada’s definition of torture murder sufficiently narrows the class of persons eligible for the death penalty to allow the dual use…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Armenta-Carpio v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Cardenas-Ornelas v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
  4. Farrey (Benjamin) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hernandez (Fernando) Vs. State (Death Penalty-Pc)Nevada Supreme Court · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API