Legal Opinion

Leighton v. Sim

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 4, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

ARNOLD M. STEIN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals the jury verdict of no cause for action and the denial of her new trial motion.

We reverse and remand for a new trial because the trial judge gave prejudicial, misleading instructions to the jury. He should not have charged the sudden emergency doctrine in this pedestrian knockdown case. There was nothing sudden about plaintiff’s appearance in the roadway in front of defendant and there was no emergency to which he had to react, unless it was one created by his inattention to conditions directly in his path.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Benton v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Hambright v. YglesiasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  3. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. State v. BonceletNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  5. Finley v. WileyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Toys" R" US, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. IN THE MATTER OF GIOVANI COLON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS(CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API